Tag Archives: Vacancy

Mann Overboard

HOUSING MATH DOESN’T ADD UP

UPDATE JULY 17, 2024 – So far, no objections to what I wrote below. I wanted to add some data. According to Zillow, inventory is higher than last year in 48 out of the 50 Major Metropolitan areas. It rose last month in 45 of the 50 markets. If we are so short on housing, why aren’t all of the houses for sale bought instantly? How can the inventory possibly increase? And, no, it is not because of high (not really high, around where they should be) mortgage rates. Simply put, the forever housing shortage rant is a hoax. False information. Propaganda.

JULY 1, 2024 – Here is your chance to email me why NAR and the NAHB may be even remotely right about our housing shortage and why I am wrong. I researched the intraweb, as my step-daughter jokingly refers to it, and found that NAR has said we have a shortage of 4.5 to 5.5 million housing units. Their logic is the annual number of houses built since the Year 2000 has been below what was needed. To paraphrase Henry Ford, that is bunk.
Let’s look at some facts and some math. First, the demand for houses by 18-55 years olds today is about 25% (!) of what it was when Baby Boomers were the same age. Second, annual population growth has declined significantly from around 2% at the start of this century to 0.53% last year. I have seen as high as 0.7% in the past few years.
Yes, total population has obviously increased over time. But, it is not double or triple what it was 20 or 40 years ago. Demand for housing is about 1/3 to 1/4th of what it used to be. So, you cannot continue to forecast based on 1980s or 1990s rates. As I note in other posts, annual GDP of +3% or +4% has been replaced with a good-excellent range of +1% to +2%. Everything is slowing down and will continue to slow down for decades ahead.
To the math….As of today, the intraweb says we have 341,814,420 people. Let’s say last year’s growth rate was low and the 0.7% rates before that were high. We will use 0.6%. (I note that CoStar uses +0.5% annually for the next 5 years.)
That means this year’s population growth is about 2,050,000 people. Average household size was 2.53 people in 2020. It too has been declining for decades. Let’s assume it is down to 2.40 today. The math says we need about 850,000 new housing units for the upcoming years.
Laughingly, NAR says we need 1.8 million new housing units and since only 1.4 million are being built we will add to our shortage. In fact, based on real math, we will have an oversupply of 550,000 housing units brought onto the market this year alone!!!! Every report I see shows apartment vacancy rates are way up from 3 years ago (about doubled in past 3 years nationwide!) and new homebuilders have a crisis of oversupply. NO ONE but NAR suggests we are not building enough housing units.
So, here’s the riddle to me. If we are short millions of housing units, wouldn’t vacancy rates for SFRs and apartment properties decline each year? If we aren’t building enough units, wouldn’t vacancy go down? Wouldn’t we see people lined up to get into the next apartment or SFR unit that becomes available?
According to CoStar, the USA had 927,018 vacant apartment units in 2021. As of today, we have 1,544,497 vacant apartment units. Over 600,000 apartment units have become vacant in a period where NAR screams that every year we are increasing our shortage by hundreds of thousands of units. Where is the logic? This doesn’t even include our 10 million vacant SFRs! (BTW, this count does NOT include second/vacation homes.)
I have contended for years that if we didn’t build a single housing unit nationwide for 5-10 years we still would not absorb all of our vacant units.
I look forward to your thoughts. The one I will say that doesn’t work for me is the vacant units are not where the people want to be. Some may be. But, most of the new supply for decades has been in the Sun Belt where the greatest demand has been. And people can live anywhere and move anywhere (especially since 2020). A few units might be old and badly located. But, old product is removed from the stockpile annually.
I will leave this one at that. Depending on feedback, I might follow up with another post on the subject.
Shalom,
The Mann
GeorgeRMann@Aol.com

Mann Overboard

THE CRE LOAN DEBACLE – FACT OR FICTION?

UPDATE – JUNE 16, 2023 – One lender contacted me and said a 300bp increase in mortgage rates has occurred. So, I wanted to update the analysis below accordingly. Most everything stays the same below. Loan amounts, Market Values, and LTVs do not change. The only items that change are the new ADS and resulting DSCR.

For Apartments/Industrial the DSCR declines from 1.3 to 1.2, which is where it was when the original loan was made. Again, I do not think this would present problems for refinancing.

For Office/Retail the DSCR declines from 1.13 to 1.05. Per below, the new LTV is 72%. So, there might be some work to do on refinancing these property types. Are the hurdles significant? I don’t think so.

Thanks to all that provided some feedback on this post.

JUNE 15, 2023 – Besides the media hanging the threat of a recession over our heads for the past year, they have jumped on the commercial real estate (CRE) loans are going to go bad by the millions and take banks down bandwagon. So far, the financial institutions I talk with have seen virtually no pain. Of course, the pundits would say, just wait, it is coming. As you probably know, I am a numbers man. So, let’s do some math. What you will see below is some property types should have no problem refinancing at the current interest rates and other property types should have a little struggle. Is there a HUGE problem out there? Per the math, I don’t see it.

APARTMENTS and INDUSTRIAL – 3+ years ago we had a property with $100,000 PGI. 5% Vacancy and 30% OER and we have an NOI of $66,500. Using common appraisal acronyms, so hopefully you know what they mean. At a 1.2 DSCR the Annual Debt Service (ADS) was $55,417. At a 4% interest rate and 20-year amortization, the Loan Amount was $762,084. At a 6% cap rate, the Market Value was $1,108,333. A 69% LTV.
In the past 3+ years, rents for these property types have increased by well over 30% in most markets. So, today we have a PGI of at least $130,000. Let’s reflect the market decline of the past year and increase vacancy to 10% (pretty crazy for these property types today) and increase the OER due to inflation increases expenses (albeit rents probably went up way more). Our current NOI is $76,050. At a 7% cap rate (rates are up about 100bp over the lows last year…might not actually be up from 3 years ago, but…we are assuming the worst-case scenario), the Market Value is $1,086,429. The original loan has been paid down to $682,750, resulting in a 63% LTV. Using a 6% interest rate (commercial rates are not up as much as residential rates) and 20-year amortization, the new ADS will be $58,697. The resulting DSCR is 1.30.
So, we are refinancing today and the LTV has declined from 69% to 63% and the DSCR has increased from 1.2 to 1.3.
I am not seeing how these borrowers, and lenders, will have any difficulty with refinancing loans that are 3-5 years old. For these property types.

OFFICE and RETAIL – I won’t bore you with the same narrative all over again. I changed the rent growth to 0% from 30%+. One could argue rents have declined for these property types. If you have evidence of such in your markets, then the scenario described here is better than you will experience. I assumed 20% Vacancy and 40% OER then and now. Those are relatively pessimistic.
The original loan was $550,073 on a Market Value of $800,000. LTV was 69%.
The outstanding loan balance is now $492,810 and the Market Value has declined to $685,714. The LTV is now 72%.

To refinance at 6% for 20 years, the new ADS will be $42,368. NOI has remained at $48,000. So, the new DSCR is 1.13.

Again, I am not seeing where the borrower or lender will have trouble refinancing this loan. If I didn’t make such negative assumptions about these property types 3 years ago (but, remember back to June 2020 and virtual all office buildings were empty and most retail stores were closed) and used a lower vacancy, it is likely the LTV increase and DSCR decrease would be a bit more. But, still not problematic.

I know the CMBS market is getting killed. However, in talking with my clients, their borrowers that own office and retail buildings have shored up the loans and there isn’t a feeling of much risk. I know for sure banks lend much different than the CMBS market.

As always, we shall see how this plays out. Note, the above is about income-producing properties. Business loans are a different story. Lots of businesses can fail and lenders take back CRE as collateral. But, the loan going bad had nothing to do with the CRE market.

Glad to receive comments as usual.

I now think I have emptied my queue of ideas to post about. As my brain never stops thinking, I am sure it will come up with something else to write about soon. All I have to do is look at media headlines and I will be triggered. lol

Shalom,

The Mann